Stratagems of the Right

However the 2020 American election fiasco plays out, one thing is clear: substantial reform is needed to continue using democracy as a means of governance. Democracy is dying. Ironically, fear of deaths from a histrionicly-endorsed pandemic [*1] was used as cover to flood American precincts with mail-in ballots counted last-minute, giving statistically impossible spikes for presidential candidate Joe Biden [*2] along with unusually high numbers of Biden-only ballots [*3], while kicking out Republican poll watchers and handing out pamphlets on how to distract them [*5], pulling out suit cases to count votes without supervision [*6], running ballots through multiple times, hiding the fact that computers for voting machines were connected to the internet [ *7] while we have an affidavit from a computer scientist on how the software can remotely manipulate votes [*8], and countless other comically-obvious examples that emerge every day. Leftists can gaslight us all they want with their r

Circa November 2020, America and the world is at a cross-roads. Under the guise of a pandemic, a slew of mail-in ballots flooding American precincts at the early-morning hours of November 4 th  (many run through multiple times) has resulted in comically-obvious election fraud. History will remember November 3-4, 2020 as a pivotal moment. If we on the right lose this battle to overturn this comically-obvious fraud or hold a new election, why would we? A new Seven Letter poll published on Politico, taken November 10-19, 2020 on the "results" of the 2020 U.S. presidential election, reveals the answer [*1]. Twelve percent of Biden voters say, "Yes, illegal voting and fraud stole this election," compared to 79% of Trump voters. A prior-released Rasmussen poll, taken November 17-18, 2020, had Democrats at 30% believing fraud likely changed the election (20% very likely) [*2]. So we can infer the Seven Letter poll may understate this number. [*2]. An Economist/YouGov pol

This essay is divided into three parts: (1) a discussion of when, if ever, lying is noble, (2) proof that, in no uncertain terms, the Apollo manned lunar voyage and landing record is fraudulent, and (3) discussion of what the Apollo lie means and if it was justified. While readers less interested in an inquiry into the nature of truth (epistemology) are welcome to scroll down to the second part due to the length of this piece, the Apollo record, when skeptically analyzed, forces epistemological questions far more interesting than answering simply whether or not two or a dozen men landed on the Moon. Ask yourself: how do you know what you claim to know?  I. The Noble Lie Is there such a thing as a noble lie? We're all familiar with "white lie," the common sense adage to gracefully avoid giving a harsh opinion, especially regarding an inconsequential matter, to someone we care for. We recognize the possible good, at least to ourselves, in avoiding telling a spouse she look