When U.S. Republicans Will be Allowed to Win Again

-

We know exactly how the U.S. political system works.

(1) Millions of mail-in ballots are registered ahead of time in key districts around the country.

(2) The voting machines are connected to the internet.

(3) Remote operators access the machines, alter necessary data, and discover how many votes they need to "find" for the mail-in ballots.

(4) Mail-in ballots are then released and/or produced and added to the totals to match what is needed for the desired candidates.

(5) The desired candidate(s) then "win" the chosen election(s), despite mathematical improbability.

(6) The U.S. media claims the result is legitimate and labels any questions or investigations raising doubt as "conspiracy theory" and a danger to "democracy."

(7) Feckless boomers cave to media pressure and rhetoric enhanced by their friends and family who accept this media narrative.

(8) Court challenges to the elections are dismissed without any hearing on the merits, as courts defer to the "election authorities" on who should win. Lawyers who file lawsuits with such challenges are sanctioned or disbarred. Thus, few will risk their licenses to bring litigation.

(9) The media, financed/controlled by the regime that runs the executive branch and banking sector behind the scenes ("the regime"), frames the "loss" by the designated losers as the clarion call to change up candidates on the losing side to ones with policies and dispositions more amenable to the regime in order to "stay relevant."

(10) When the losing political party puts up candidates that are sufficiently amenable/controllable to a narrative of the ruling regime, they are allowed to win in order to maintain the illusion that elections are legitimate.

Of course, to maintain this illusion of legitimacy, the regime will need Republicans to regain control at some point in the future. November 2022 was not the time, nor will 2024 be, unless Donald Trump is explicitly not chosen as the running presidential candidate. The regime's goal is to push out "Trumpism" from Republican party, meaning nationalism, hostility toward the regime, and/or any threats to "drain the swamp" (the regime).

How Did the Regime Get Us Here?
The regime dominates the executive branch, behind the scenes, because about a hundred years ago, the U.S. Congress began delegating most of its authority to executive agencies (e.g., Congress doesn't write rules for pollution, the Environmental Protection Agency does). This means our rules were increasingly being made by bureaucrats, and Congress decreasingly had any use outside of raising the debt ceiling, authorizing more money, and investigating people at hearings. Around this time, the country's finances were given to a private central bank, the Federal Reserve, and controllers of this are also part of the regime.

Agencies became increasingly autonomous and outside the control of the president, especially the so-called "seventeen intelligence" ones and banking institutions via the Federal Reserve. This we refer to collectively, as "the regime," which is a parallel institution to the presidency.

In other words, power used to be shared between congress (writers of laws) and the president (enforcer of laws). Congress delegated its authority to the presidency, until it had little authority left. And, over time, presidents lost their authority to the agencies within, because presidents come and go, but the ruling bureaucracy remained.

Where the Regime is Going with Future "Republicans"
This notion of who will "win" elections is insignificant compared to who controls the regime. The U.S. has a bureaucracy that makes the rules governing our health and safety. Sometimes Democrats will be in power, and the social agendas like eliminating bail for most crimes (because of racism, of course) or funding transgender surgeries for children will be promoted. Sometimes Republicans will be in power, and taxes might be cut by a few percentage points. But what must always be maintained are the interests of the regime. This involves pushing for conflict around the world to maintain the neoliberal "rules based" order and punishing any dissenters from it (e.g., China, Russia, Iran).

So, Republicans will be allowed to scream about transgenderism and reduce funding for it. They will be allowed to lower taxes. Democrats will be allowed to eliminate bail and fund transgenderism in children. They will be allowed to raise taxes. And the ebb and flow between this is desired by the regime, because control is easier to maintain with the illusion of democracy (every eight years or so "my guy" wins). But what no one will be permitted to do is challenge the "rules based" world order the regime desires. Foreign governments will continue to be controlled, as the regime will tell them what to do. The regime is about so much more than control over the U.S. population. It is about control of governments around the world, and it must maintain power at all costs for its preservation.

https://www.thegreatcoursesplus.com/the-agency-a-history-of-the-cia (page 221 of course book).

There is a temptation among the right to abandon "Trumpism" to get token conservative policies in place, such as lowering taxes and defeating insane measures on the political left like defunding police, eliminating bail for most crimes, and pushing transgender surgeries for children. That will be the devil's bargain. Conservatives will be asked to abandon the Trumpian notion of hostility to the regime, which lusts for war and maintaining empire through constant conflict.

Example: BAD DOG.



GOOD DOG:


News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days | Shorenstein Center

This is why Republican control of the U.S. Congress and the Senate was derailed. The so-called MAGA Republicans were going to start investigating the regime. That cannot be allowed.

So, those amongst the right will have to make a choice: (1) keep voting MAGA until the legitimacy of elections is completely eroded and a revolution occurs with new political entities taking over what will be a former United States or (2) a silent, passive compromise with the regime to allow token issues of conservatives to be entertained and to stem the tide of insane leftist policies coming.

I am for the former. What say you?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of the Moon-Hoax Confession Made by Eugene Ruben Akers

-
Image
On September 11, 2022, Bart Sibrel released a death-bed video by Eugene "Gillmore," whose real name was Eugene Ruben Akers, the son of Cyrus Eugene Akers, explaining how his father made a death-bed confession about Apollo 11 being filmed at Cannon Air-Force Base, by Clovis New Mexico, on June 1-3, 1968 [*1]. Eugene died on February 13, 2022. He did not want the video released until after his death. I transcribed the audio of Eugene Ruben Akers below. A link to the video recording is hyperlinked above ( and here ). Bart Sibrel notes the video was recorded on April 12, 2020 and taken by Eugene's son. Hello. My name is Gene Gillmore. Um, my birth-given name is Eugene Ruben Akers. I don't want any money for what I'm doing, because hopefully this video won't come out until after my death [note by Eugene's son: Died February 13, 2022]. So, I have nothing to gain, nothing to profit, by telling you what I'm going to tell you. And, um, a lot of what I'm go
Read more

What You Should Know Before Opposing U.S. Employer-Mandated COVID-19 Vaccination (Especially in Illinois)

-
Image
NOTE: Since publishing this article, the Illinois legislature, during the last week of October 2021, passed a law that the Illinois governor will likely sign that may, or, as I argue, may not change Illinois' Healthcare Right of Conscience Act. On November 3, 2021, I published a piece discussing this issue you can read here . 1805 British political cartoon by James Gillray, "The Cow-Pock—or—the Wonderful Effects of the New Inoculation!” Edward Jenner vaccinates patients in the Smallpox and Inoculation Hospital at St. Pancras, as patients develop features of cows. The "anti-vaxx" debate has raged for centuries. In response to a U.S. executive order signed on September 9, 2021 [*1], and other executive orders signed by state governors, many employers are mandating employees receive COVID-19 vaccination or face termination ( UPDATE: On November 5, 2021, the Occupational Health and Safety Administration filed a regulation, going into effect January 4, 2022 , mandating
Read more

Exposing Lyndon Johnson's Apollo Fraud and Big Tech's Censorship of Bart Sibrel's Book, Moon Man

-
Image
NOTE:   This piece analyzes Bart Sibrel's September-2021-published book,  Moon Man: The True Story of a Filmmaker on the CIA Hit List , spoiling some of its shocking contents. Because the book is being digitally shadow-banned from searches, I aim to boost this critical information to the widest audience possible. Mr. Sibrel sacrificed his career and familial and church relationships to bring us the information in his book, only available on Amazon for now. Please click here and purchase a copy to support him  and visit his website here to follow him and purchase a copy of his two documentaries: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon and Astronauts Gone Wild.   On September 22, 2021, an audio version of Moon Man will be available as well. To hobbyist Moon-landing deniers, like myself, the Apollo fraud, that occurred 1968-1972 (Apollo 8 through Apollo 17), is palpably obvious. The photographic record was shot in a studio with false backgrounds. The backgrounds are comically
Read more

An Epistemological Study of Apollo 15: What If We Never Went to the Moon?

-
Image
How much of our knowledge of the material world is derived from the authority of others as opposed to of our own investigation? Perfect certainty of truth in the material world is impossible; we simply approximate the greater odds that the knowledge we hold is correct versus not and believe accordingly. As the old adage goes, we see through a glass darkly. But we see enough. This is why criminal justice in many nations is served upon knowledge that guilt is beyond a reasonable doubt as opposed to by perfect certainty. There's always room for doubt, because knowledge of events in the material world can never be perfectly certain. To require perfect certainty before acting would paralyze all our activity. Thus, we never require it to take action. Even our most certain knowledge, like what we had for dinner last night, can't be held in perfect confidence. Our memories can fail us. While mathematics may be known with absolute certainty, as equations have objectively correct ans
Read more

An Epistemological Study of Apollo 11: Is There a Noble Lie?

-
Image
This essay is divided into three parts: (1) a discussion of when, if ever, lying is noble, (2) proof that, in no uncertain terms, the Apollo manned lunar voyage and landing record is fraudulent, and (3) discussion of what the Apollo lie means and if it was justified. While readers less interested in an inquiry into the nature of truth (epistemology) are welcome to scroll down to the second part due to the length of this piece, the Apollo record, when skeptically analyzed, forces epistemological questions far more interesting than answering simply whether or not two or a dozen men landed on the Moon. Ask yourself: how do you know what you claim to know?  I. The Noble Lie Is there such a thing as a noble lie? We're all familiar with "white lie," the common sense adage to gracefully avoid giving a harsh opinion, especially regarding an inconsequential matter, to someone we care for. We recognize the possible good, at least to ourselves, in avoiding telling a spouse she look
Read more

An Epistemological Study of Apollo 17: A Do-It-Yourself Guide to Proving Photo AS17-134-20384 Is Fraudulent

-
Image
As a hobbyist Moon-landing denier, I write for different types of audiences open to the reality that Apollo was a comical fraud, Santa Clause for the boomer generation. For those who enjoy getting straight to the point, I have a series of photo analyses [*1]. For those who enjoy pondering the philosophical implications of the fraud, I have a lengthier analysis [*2]. And for those who want something in between, I have you covered too [*3]. The best type of knowledge is foundational. You know what you had for dinner last night, because you ate it. You know what your neighbor had for dinner last night, because that's what he told you. Absent faulty memory or broken senses, the former is known with certainty. The latter you believe as a symbol of your trust in your neighbor, but you don't know for sure. Let's say your neighbor sends you a picture of himself on vacation, but you discover the image he sends is fake (perhaps he's standing by a convincing cardboard cutout of
Read more

Adverse Effects from COVID-19 Vaccination Represent 62.12% of U.S. Vaccine-Related Deaths (and 67.03% of All) Reported to the CDC, 1990 - November 5, 2021

-
Image
NOTE: This piece will be periodically updated to include the latest data available (LAST UPDATED NOVEMBER 14, 2021). See anything unusual below?    I pulled the above table from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for data through November 5, 2021 ("ALL LOCATIONS"), which is available on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website [*1] and tracks vaccine-related injuries and deaths in the United States since 1990. When the search is refined to "U.S./territories/unknown," the figure halves, meaning over half of deaths reported to the CDC come from outside the U.S ( UPDATE: I explore this anomaly in a piece here,  about 1/5th of VAERS reports are foreign, but HALF of COVID-19 deaths are foreign , which is evidence of shenanigans or gross underrepresentation in the U.S. data reporting).     VAERS is a voluntary self-reporting tool that is used by health-care workers but can also be used by individuals. If an unexplained injury or death
Read more

When They Realized They Could Get Away with Anything...

-
Image
How did we get here? How did we go from "two weeks to slow the spread" to a demand for perpetual jabs in exchange for seasonal permission to engage in public leisure and our right to earn a living [*1]? How did an obviously-senile man become ruler of the post-free world, as we pretend he (and not his handlers) makes decisions for us? Why the Wicked Need Our Irrational Belief to Rule Us The  comically-obvious U.S. election fraud of 2020 [*2],  that even foreign leftists are not only conceding but worrying about the ramifications of  [*3], reveals how critical controlling the U.S. is to the global power structure that rules us. The U.S., as an empire, rules most of the world, not with an iron fist, but implicitly, as decisions in jurisdictions around the world commonly mirror U.S. policy. Non-U.S. jurisdictions fear the consequences of not following U.S. lead, like economic sanctions, potential military action, or the U.S. intelligence apparatus overthrowing their government
Read more

On Musty Boomer Lunacy...

-
Image
These photo studies riff off discoveries originally made by David Percy, Jack White, Marcus Allen, Bart Sibrel, Leonid Konovolov, Jarrah White, and Scott Henderson. The Moon is about 240,000 miles away. The last time a human being ventured higher than about 400 miles "up" was on Apollo 17 in 1972. How do we know human beings landed on the Moon? How much of our knowledge comes from reliance on the word of those in authority versus from our own foundational examination? "What primarily motivates [people into not questioning Apollo] is fear. But it is not the lie itself that scares people; it is what that lie says about the world around us and how it really functions. For if NASA was able to pull off such an outrageous hoax before the entire world, and then keep that lie in place for [over five] decades, what does that say about the control of the information we receive? What does that say about the media, and the scientific community, and the educational community,
Read more