When U.S. Republicans Will be Allowed to Win Again
We know exactly how the U.S. political system works.
(1) Millions of mail-in ballots are registered ahead of time in key districts around the country.
(2) The voting machines are connected to the internet.
(3) Remote operators access the machines, alter necessary data, and discover how many votes they need to "find" for the mail-in ballots.
(4) Mail-in ballots are then released and/or produced and added to the totals to match what is needed for the desired candidates.
(5) The desired candidate(s) then "win" the chosen election(s), despite mathematical improbability.
(6) The U.S. media claims the result is legitimate and labels any questions or investigations raising doubt as "conspiracy theory" and a danger to "democracy."
(7) Feckless boomers cave to media pressure and rhetoric enhanced by their friends and family who accept this media narrative.
(8) Court challenges to the elections are dismissed without any hearing on the merits, as courts defer to the "election authorities" on who should win. Lawyers who file lawsuits with such challenges are sanctioned or disbarred. Thus, few will risk their licenses to bring litigation.
(9) The media, financed/controlled by the regime that runs the executive branch and banking sector behind the scenes ("the regime"), frames the "loss" by the designated losers as the clarion call to change up candidates on the losing side to ones with policies and dispositions more amenable to the regime in order to "stay relevant."
(10) When the losing political party puts up candidates that are sufficiently amenable/controllable to a narrative of the ruling regime, they are allowed to win in order to maintain the illusion that elections are legitimate.
Of course, to maintain this illusion of legitimacy, the regime will need Republicans to regain control at some point in the future. November 2022 was not the time, nor will 2024 be, unless Donald Trump is explicitly not chosen as the running presidential candidate. The regime's goal is to push out "Trumpism" from Republican party, meaning nationalism, hostility toward the regime, and/or any threats to "drain the swamp" (the regime).
How Did the Regime Get Us Here?
The regime dominates the executive branch, behind the scenes, because about a hundred years ago, the U.S. Congress began delegating most of its authority to executive agencies (e.g., Congress doesn't write rules for pollution, the Environmental Protection Agency does). This means our rules were increasingly being made by bureaucrats, and Congress decreasingly had any use outside of raising the debt ceiling, authorizing more money, and investigating people at hearings. Around this time, the country's finances were given to a private central bank, the Federal Reserve, and controllers of this are also part of the regime.
Agencies became increasingly autonomous and outside the control of the president, especially the so-called "seventeen intelligence" ones and banking institutions via the Federal Reserve. This we refer to collectively, as "the regime," which is a parallel institution to the presidency.
In other words, power used to be shared between congress (writers of laws) and the president (enforcer of laws). Congress delegated its authority to the presidency, until it had little authority left. And, over time, presidents lost their authority to the agencies within, because presidents come and go, but the ruling bureaucracy remained.
Where the Regime is Going with Future "Republicans"
This notion of who will "win" elections is insignificant compared to who controls the regime. The U.S. has a bureaucracy that makes the rules governing our health and safety. Sometimes Democrats will be in power, and the social agendas like eliminating bail for most crimes (because of racism, of course) or funding transgender surgeries for children will be promoted. Sometimes Republicans will be in power, and taxes might be cut by a few percentage points. But what must always be maintained are the interests of the regime. This involves pushing for conflict around the world to maintain the neoliberal "rules based" order and punishing any dissenters from it (e.g., China, Russia, Iran).
So, Republicans will be allowed to scream about transgenderism and reduce funding for it. They will be allowed to lower taxes. Democrats will be allowed to eliminate bail and fund transgenderism in children. They will be allowed to raise taxes. And the ebb and flow between this is desired by the regime, because control is easier to maintain with the illusion of democracy (every eight years or so "my guy" wins). But what no one will be permitted to do is challenge the "rules based" world order the regime desires. Foreign governments will continue to be controlled, as the regime will tell them what to do. The regime is about so much more than control over the U.S. population. It is about control of governments around the world, and it must maintain power at all costs for its preservation.
There is a temptation among the right to abandon "Trumpism" to get token conservative policies in place, such as lowering taxes and defeating insane measures on the political left like defunding police, eliminating bail for most crimes, and pushing transgender surgeries for children. That will be the devil's bargain. Conservatives will be asked to abandon the Trumpian notion of hostility to the regime, which lusts for war and maintaining empire through constant conflict.
Example: BAD DOG.
GOOD DOG:
News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days | Shorenstein Center
So, those amongst the right will have to make a choice: (1) keep voting MAGA until the legitimacy of elections is completely eroded and a revolution occurs with new political entities taking over what will be a former United States or (2) a silent, passive compromise with the regime to allow token issues of conservatives to be entertained and to stem the tide of insane leftist policies coming.
I am for the former. What say you?
Comments
Post a Comment